Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Britta's avatar

I have a question about this concept. If a child doesn’t have consistent impulse control yet, it seems like it isn’t a “choice” for them to do something that is undesirable or not in line with executive function etc. The word choice seems like an adult judgement of their capacity without assuming best intention. It also seems to not be holding space for neurodivergence. Certainly there is a line between permissive and intentional, but I would love to hear your thoughts more on the concept of “choice” when the brain is still developing. For instance, in the example of the child being late--if their brains can’t fully weigh vague responsibility versus immediate dopamine, or they genuinely tried their best to get home quickly but something else got in their way, and then they get home to a parent telling them to “make a better choice” next time, that is judgemental, vague, unhelpful, and not collaborative. Do they have their own watch? Do they need a timer? Why do they even need to be home at an arbitrary time? Are they motivated or demotivated to do so? (Eg is it for something fun or homework)

What would it look like if the parent instead came alongside them more neutrally saying “I noticed it was hard to get home at the agreed upon time today. Can you tell me about that? What happened? What do you think we should do/how can I help you for next time?”

If my partner said that comment about making a better choice to me, I would feel unseen and that there was no empathy or curiosity or even respect for my best efforts. I believe children are always doing their best, so the suggestion that they make a “better choice” seems like it would backfire in terms of connection and trust.

I do like the intention behind the word choice for the positive reinforcement and I do see the logic there.

No posts

Ready for more?